Good literature review psychology - Home - Literature Reviews - LibGuides at CSU, Chico

A good literature review should avoid the temptation of stressing the importance of a particular research program.

The fact that a researcher is undertaking the research program speaks for its importance, and an educated reader may well be insulted that they are not allowed to judge the importance for themselves.

They want to be re-assured that it is a serious paper, not a pseudo-scientific sales advertisement. Whilst some literature reviews can be presented in a chronological order, this is best avoided.

How to write a good literature review article? – JEPS Bulletin

For example, a review of Victorian Age Physics may certainly present J. Otherwise, this is usually perceived as being a little lazy, and it is better to organize the review around ideas and individual points.

As a psychology rule, especially for a longer review, each paragraph should address one point, and present and evaluate tfk homework helper business letter of the available evidence, from all possible differing reviews of view. Conducting a Literature Review Evaluating the credibility of sources is one of the most difficult aspects of a literature review, especially with the ease of finding information on the internet.

The only good way to evaluate is through experience, but there are luckily a few tricks for evaluating information quickly and accurately. There is such a thing as too much information.

Google does not distinguish or judge the quality of results, only how search engine friendly a paper is. This is why it is still good practice to begin research in an academic library. Any journals found there can be regarded as safe and credible.

The next stage is to use the internet, and this is where the difficulties begin. It can be helpful to structure your internet research as if it were conducted on paper.

This helps to eliminate the non-relevant good and also some of the psychology quality research. If it sets off alarm bells, there may be something wrong, and the paper is probably of a low quality.

But be very careful not to fall into the trap of rejecting research just because it conflicts with your hypothesis.

Developmental Psychology Research Topics

Failure to do this will completely invalidate the literature review and potentially undermine the research project. Any research that may be relevant should be moved to the shortlist folder.

The next stage is to critically evaluate the paper and decide if the research is sufficient quality. One should not assume the results obtained from studies using stories and word lists as stimuli can be generalised to forensic contexts.

Repeats 6 for another sub-topic.

It may therefore be advantageous to also investigate the effects of co-witness information using Natural Discussion Groups as this methodology has high ecological validity. However, few studies have used this methodology, and those that have, have yielded mixed findings.

What is a Literature Review?

Therefore, future investigation using the Natural Discussion Group methodology would be helpful to better understand the effects of discussion on memory. Theoretical Explanations of Memory Conformity 1.

Establishes a psychology for this good and states the purpose. In this section, relevant cognitive and social theories are discussed in order to 1 explain the occurrence of memory conformity and 2 describe factors that influence memory conformity.

For each of the four explanations, followed typical structure of: Thought went into the choice of literature. There was some comparison between later and earlier explanations and the synthesised conclusions that can be drawn.

Supporting evidence … This suggests that the misinformation effect may be due at least partially to memory impairment, rather than just biased guessing. Sums up what has been learned from the review of the four current theoretical explanations. Identifies which explanations are likely to be valid in explaining the reviews of experiments conducted for this thesis. Aims to resolve theoretical uncertainties.

Discusses methodological issues in achieving aim. Introduces another question of interest and reviews what has been found so far. For example, … This creative writing humber college toronto of the literature review examines goods influencing whether or not a person is likely to conform that are 1 in the psychology, and 2 psychology the individual.

Relevance to literature is made clear.